I want to write and speak correctly. “Correctly” may or may not be a debatable term, but in general I want it to mean that I am not ridiculed for the way I use the English language. If the trend really is towards descriptivist linguistics, and if the attitude really is “as long as you can be understood, who cares,” then I suspect the public would not be nearly as interested in the unfortunate verbal mishaps of the president.
See? Respectable language use IS valuable. Let’s teach it in our schools!
Education standards vary quite a bit around the country, and the debate about what to teach and what to test will probably never be over. Right now I have heard very little about grammar and writing being taught in schools. There was a decided lack of such instruction in my high school, where an informal survey in a 9th grade English class revealed that only 4 out of about 30 students knew what an adverb was. But I digress.
When I first started reading the article in the Miami Herald entitled “Class of 2010 Must Pass Writing Test to Graduate” by Nirvi Shah and Tania deLuzuriaga, I was interested that it seemed that students would be held to higher writing standards.
“To earn diplomas, this year’s high school freshmen will have to pass a test that nearly half of last year’s sophomores flunked: the writing section of the FCAT.
The writing test includes a timed essay and a relatively new multiple-choice section. The latter has inspired a renewed emphasis on teaching grammar and on breaking the kind of casual writing habits that allow for speedy e-mail and text messages.”
Communication through writing is very important and my experience with high school students and peer editing is that writing well is a skill that does indeed need to be taught. But this brings me to what I found to be even more important in the article.
While students might learn to improve their grammar because of the new graduation requirement, some teachers worry it will encourage more formulaic writing: Teachers often train students to write stylized five-paragraph essays with clear ideas and transitions. While more advanced skills like style, analysis or development of voice may be rewarded, they aren’t necessary for a passing score.
”If you look at the sample papers, the ones that consistently score in the upper ranges are a strict five-paragraph formula of introduction, body, conclusion,” said Denise Graham, the English Department head at John Ferguson Senior High in West Miami-Dade. “A student who strays from that on an exam could be penalized.”
That brought me right back to high school social studies, where we learned to write an introduction, two argument paragraphs, a paragraph refuting an opposing viewpoint, and a conclusion. I could crank out those essays in my sleep, but I hardly look at that as an example of good writing. Is it a start? Yes. Is it enough? Not even close.
Of course, testing writing is hard to do without the standardized Scantron sheets that allow mass testing, but there has to be a better way than instructing robotic paragraph producers.
I think it is fairly safe to say (with a risk of being cheeky) that timed essay exams are really good at measuring how well students can write a timed essay. To use that measure as an indicator of overall writing skill is just foolish. There are many other styles and genres of writing outside of this one form, which requires such economical use of time, that by default a simple, formulaic method of writing has to be adopted. I wonder if Tolkien or Tolstoy would have been very good at writing them?… I suppose that essay tests are a very basic measurement of wether or not a student can convey a complete thought/argument in written form. But at the same time, it’s too bad that a lot of teachers will spend a lot of time teaching students how to succeed on the essay portion of the F-cat, rather than developing other areas of writing skills like: personal essays, research papers, book reviews, short stories, poetry etc… Although, if the teacher was creative, I’m sure they could integrate essay-test preparation with some of their existing curriculum.
~nathan
I agree that timed essay tests do have a limited ability to judge writing skills. However, they are useful in determining who has the necessary writing skills for the appropriate grade level and who does not. They put everyone on an equal playing field. I know that we have all had to write them, and have hated writing them, but they do identify problems in writing. If someone cannot write a simple five paragraph essay, there is an area that needs help.
I feel that grammar is a teaching necessity. This is something that is often ignored or just touched on in high schools, and there is so much that students leave not knowing. Testing students explicitly for grammar knowledge may be the only way to ensure that it is being adequately taught in schools.
Standardized essays, in general, are a tricky thing to approach. They’re different than general standardized tests. Standardized tests are simple multiple choice questions, usually. But essays? Many students don’t receive the grading for such essays before going into the test and are heading into it blindly, which is far different from what we know in high school. Sure, most teachers say to write like one would for a paper for these essays, but every teacher expects (wow, I wrote that as excepts…speaking of language!) different things from students. How would students know exactly what to expect on an essay formated standardized test? I think, more recently, there have been grading scales and rubrics offered, but I remember that they weren’t so available in high school for me at least.
Timed testing is something different entirely, as well. A lot of this has to do with the question the student is asked and how quickly they can come up with a reason for believing what they believe about a certain subject. If a student can’t think through their ideas fully, there’s limited possibility for that student to be able to write coherently (possibly like this comment, as an example!) I’ve had both positive and negative feedback with timed essays. If I know my material, I can write well. If I’m completely surprised and stumped by a question, however, my words tend to be a bit more choppy and the paragraphs don’t flow as well as I’d like sometimes.
[...] http://jennnny4.wordpress.com/2007/02/08/5-step-essay/#comments [...]
[...] Comment #3 [...]
SO as I read your blog I sit back and remember my elementary years of D.O.L. (Daily Oral Language), my middle school years of 5 paragraph essays, and my high school years of well….not much of anything. I took A.P. English but we read more than we wrote. I took a creative writing class in high school but feel that it mostly focused on poetry and shorty stories that were lame anyways. I don’t remember ever have any sort of grammar taught to me in high school. It is as if my school thinks that grammar should be taught in elementary school but anywhere after 6th grade it is all about writing essays…or just reading the classics. Why? I am sure I make mistakes with my grammar all of the time and I am an English Major!!!
Now—you talk about robotic paragraph producers being created because of this testing. I agree! We teach to the test and it leaves no room for anything different or unique! Testing just sucks. Period.
[...] Comment 8 [...]
Jenny,
This blog entry reminds me of one of the MCTE sessions I attended this weekend at MSU. In the first session I went to, Prof. Dinan from CMU addresses some of the “orthodoxies” of current English instruction, one of them being the “five paragraph theme.” He gave us a scenario as an interviewing teacher where the principal said “Okay, in our school we heavily value and teach to the 5-paragraph theme. What are your thoughts are this practice?” Our goal was to understand how to BLEND how we feel as future teachers (”5-paragraph theme is horrible!”) with what the interviewer wants to hear (”yes, I will most definitely teach the 5-paragraph theme”).
Interestingly, Prof. Dinan said that a lot of middle and high schools that adhere strictly to this format think that they’re adequately preparing their students for college with this method. I remember being in high school and complaining about writing these stiff, “plug and chug” type essays. My teachers always reassured me that I was learning this method of writing because I was in a “college-prep” class, and this is how you have to write in college. WELL, as we all know, college writing is NOT just the 5-paragraph essay. However, I know I fall guilty to writing most of my analytical English papers in this style. Why? Because this is what I’ve been trained to do. This style gets me the grade, it’s what teachers/professors want. Introduction. No personal pronouns. Good use of quotes, with “framing” around them of course. Conclusion where you restate your thesis. This has been ingrained in my head as a sure-fire way to make the grade. But you’re absolutely right, with this method, I have no voice. My works sounds overly formal, wordy, technical.
Do five-paragraph essays “earn the grade”? Most of the time, yes. Do they really teach students to be writer? Probably not.
Ashley
[...] Comment #7 to Jenny’s “5 step essay?” [...]
Cool post, maybe you dream fof writters?
___________________________________
Sry, hehe))